Trump and ‘The National Review’: we are defined by our enemies

Author: us-russia
Comments: 0
Trump and ‘The National Review’: we are defined by our enemies
Published 26-01-2016, 09:28

Gilbert Doctorow, Ph.D.

Gilbert Doctorow is the European Coordinator of the American Committee for East West Accord, Ltd. Gilbert Doctorow is a Research Fellow of the American University in Moscow

What follows is not an unqualified endorsement of Donald Trump for the November elections. But it is a call to reason among American intellectuals who are as skeptical of voting for a populist, one of the unwashed, as the Russian intelligentsia is skeptical of their country’s own populist, Vladimir Putin.

Trump and ‘The National Review’: we are defined by our enemies

Hats off to Donald Trump for his disparaging remarks about The National Review and their pitiful attempt at a demo job on his campaign in their latest issue. TNR has assembled a collection of testimonials from personalities reputed to be "conservative” and all laying into The Donald.

We are defined by our enemies, and the editorial board of The National Review, in defending what it calls the conservatives' "ideological consensus" has highlighted just what is wrong with the party's establishment.

America grew to its present strengths not by ideology but by pragmatism and a can-do philosophy, which is what Donald brings to the 2016 presidential campaign. He has taken "common sense" and run with it as his campaign platform on many, though, to be sure, not all issues. To that we can all say thanks.

And as for conservatism, with William Kristol at the center of the TNR jeering team, what we see is not "conservatism" but "neo-conservatism", which is a radical, extremist distortion of conservative principles. Indeed they are alarmed about Donald, whose approach to global issues is precisely non-ideological and realistic. This is a central issue because foreign affairs are precisely where a president has the greatest freedom to dominate the national agenda.

The foregoing is not an unqualified endorsement of Donald Trump for the November elections. But it is a call to reason among American intellectuals who are as skeptical of voting for a populist, one of the unwashed, as the Russian intelligentsia is skeptical of their country’s own populist, Vladimir Putin.

Meanwhile, on the Democratic side of the ledger, regrettably both leading candidates, Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, are enthralled to their ideologies of choice at the expense of common sense and realism. Still more sadly, with respect to the number one security issue facing the United States, relations with its nuclear-armed peer, Russia, both candidates offer only more of the same smallness of mind and spirit that we have seen in the past 7 years of the Obama presidency.

 

usforeignpolicy.blogs.lalibre.be

Comments: 0
Experts' Panel
Save the Planet Expert`s Pannel
Presently a growing number of people, including well known and...
Save the Planet Expert`s Pannel
Top
popular in the journal
Afghanistan Is a Debacle - But You...

Afghanistan Is a Debacle - But You...

If one scans this week’s headlines they are all gloom and doom, running from despair and humiliation to disaster and debacle. But rarely do you see calls for a ...
RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 19...

RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 19...

THE END. The unipolar moment is over and the hyperpower was defeated by a guy on a bicycle (with, note, a rifle the US taxpayer provided.) NATO’s brag ...
After the Afghanistan debacle,...

After the Afghanistan debacle,...

As expected, the blame game on who lost Afghanistan is now in full swing.
War with Russia & China would...

War with Russia & China would...

With global nuclear stockpiles growing and countries upgrading their warheads and rockets, there is an almost unprecedented need to de-escalate tensions and avert atomic ...
Russia hopes for resultative...

Russia hopes for resultative...

According to Ryabkov, the sides are currently discussing possible formats of the working groups