Trump's Missile Strike: Straight From the Neocon Playbook

Author: us-russia
Comments: 0
Trump
Published 13-04-2017, 00:00

President Trump's missile strike on Syria changes everything. In embarking on this illegal unilateral action, the Trump administration looks to have destroyed any prospect of fomenting positive relations with Russia, with serious consequences when it comes to fighting a terrorist menace that is a threat to the citizens of both countries.

President Trump's missile strike on Syria changes everything. In embarking on this illegal unilateral action, the Trump administration looks to have destroyed any prospect of fomenting positive relations with Russia, with serious consequences when it comes to fighting a terrorist menace that is a threat to the citizens of both countries.

The rush to judgement in Washington in the wake of the alleged chemical weapons attack on Khan Sheikhoun in Syria's Idlib province has been revelatory. And with US regional allies such as Turkey, the Saudis, and Israelis calling for regime change in Damascus in its wake, and with the likes of the UK, France, and other global US allies doing likewise, the potential for escalation is self-evident.

It is hard to fathom how in the space of just a few days, the Trump administration could move from a stated position of no regime change in Syria to launching 59 Tomahawk missiles at a government airbase in the country in violation of international law. As for Syria's President Bashar al-Assad, what possible motive could have led to him authorizing such a heinous attack on civilians, especially at a point where his forces were winning the conflict so decisively on the ground, and when his government was making significant progress diplomatically?

And why has Washington dismissed Russia and Iran's call for an independent UN investigation in order to find out what happened? What does the US have to fear?

It is impossible to ignore the spectre of Iraq with regard to this crisis. Fourteen years ago, the Bush administration unleashed the most devastating war the world has experienced since Vietnam, again on the basis of allegations of WMD. Those allegations turned out to be false. Could the US and its allies really be contemplating making the same mistake again today?

On this episode of Hard Facts, John is joined from Washington by political analyst and academic, Edward Lozansky. Together they unpack this game-changing event, exploring its ramifications and the prospects of it leading direct military confrontation between Washington and Moscow.

This is one episode not to be missed.

 

sputniknews.com

Comments: 0
Experts' Panel
Are the U.S. and Russia...
The Sunday, February 24 edition of Russian state television’s...
Are the U.S. and Russia...
Top
popular in the journal
STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT OF...

STATEMENT BY THE PRESIDENT OF...

On February 1, 2019, the United States of America launched a procedure to withdraw from the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles. ...
Is it about Western values or...

Is it about Western values or...

When it comes to U.S. foreign policy, what we frequently hear from politicians and mainstream media is that it must be based on the well-known foundations of Western ...
Watch Buckingham Palace as Newly...

Watch Buckingham Palace as Newly...

Newly-elected British PM Boris Johnson is meeting Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace and officially taking over office from Theresa May.
PATRICK LAWRENCE: Finally Time for...

PATRICK LAWRENCE: Finally Time for...

The crumbling of Russiagate focuses attention on the considerable evidence that Russian intelligence agencies charged with intrusion into DNC servers had nothing to do ...
RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 25 JULY...

RUSSIAN FEDERATION SITREP 25 JULY...

STALIN. The Presidential Council on Civil Society and Human Rights condemns efforts to erect statues to Stalin: "civil servants of all levels should be clearly ...